Federal Judges have what is called judicial immunity.  This means that they can make binding decisions that injure or financially devastate consumers without repercussions for those decisions.  This site makes those judges accountable not to a jury of only 12, but to a jury of 300 million Americans, or over 6 billion worldwide citizens.

"Official" judicial decisions by all these judges are available through the PACER website:
http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/

Federal Judge Anthony Trenga, Eastern District of Virginia, 08-cv-01324.  On May 8, 2009, Judge Trenga will be ruling whether consumers should be protected from $B$ builders such as D R Horton [DHI].  DHI among the other builders, collects good faith deposits which are ‘forfeitable at the builder’s discretion’ for such occurrences as ‘not completing lender requirements.’  In other words, if consumers don’t capitulate to using a builder’s much more expensive affiliated lender, then the builder can cancel the consumer’s contract, keep their cash deposits and go off to find other victims.  Judge Trenga has in evidence 7700 pages of assorted builder RICO supplied by HUD, 500 pages of DHI specific RICO supplied in an amicus brief forwarded to the DOJ, 190 official FTC records gathered under Freedom of Information Act request #2009-00355, and knows that DHI admits to receiving 1500 pages of notice that DHI sponsored RICO has occurred for years [Nevada, Clark County, case # A551662].

Federal Judge Roger Benitez, Southern District of California, San Diego Division, 08-cv-00592.  Judge Benitez compelled defrauded consumers into arbitration on a “sliding scale.”  $B$DHI victims were forced into predatory loans with extortive threats of deposit forfeiture if they did not capitulate to closing under DHI’s much more expensive predatory terms.  Judge Benitez believes that $B$ DHI should be allowed to practice nationwide RICO, and then if caught, to only have to go to arbitration where confidential settlements allow $B$DHI to continue fleecing the masses.  Inevitably then, fraud will reoccur for which $B$DHI will again only have to settle for a pittance to continue reaping millions from consumers.

Federal Judge Sandra Armstrong, 9^th District, Northern District of California, Oakland Division- 07-cv-02625.  Notwithstanding the submission of non hearsay or hearsay-excepted exhibits including over 40 nationwide predatory lending victims’ statements, some of which signed under penalty of perjury on official state complaint forms, many complete with email, telephone and address contact information, her ruling dismissed $B$DHI from the suit.  Also ignored was a non-hearsay police report (generated in the ordinary scope of business by a government authority commissioned to report accurately) #070793172 which documented a car bomb that destroyed a federal whistleblower’s car hood at 10:00 PM August 3, 2007, on one of 30 consecutive evenings when his web sites were informing over 1,000 consumers of $B$DHI’s RICO daily.  190 official pages of “responsive” FTC Freedom of Information Request records, FOIA #2009-00355, later corroborated $B$DHI’s nationwide RICO.  HUD has submitted 7700 pages of administrative records in federal case 08-cv-01324 as evidence which also in part prove $B$DHI’s nationwide RICO.

Federal Judge Reidinger, District Court of North Carolina, 09-cv-00065.  Judge Reidinger refused to grant class action status for victims of common, typical and numerous severe construction defects in favor of $B$DHI.  This notwithstanding that communities across the Country have had to file class action suits to even remotely interest $B$ DHI in considering to warrant rampant defective and non code compliant construction.  Municipalities across the Country have even had to freeze $B$DHI’s performance bonds to compel them to perform warranty for piddly, insignificant consumer-victims.  Judge Reidinger has required that individual victims now individually take on the $B$builder and its bevy of expensive legal defense firms.  Visit http://www.jdpower.com/homes where $B$RICO operating DHI consistently ranks among the lowest quality builders and among the worst in warranty for a reason.

Federal Judge Edinfield, District Court of Georgia, Atlanta Division, 07-cv-00081.  Judge Edinfield dismissed a RESPA class action claim which alleged that $B$DHI was forcing consumers to use their in house affiliated mortgage company.  This is the same exact claim that HUD is currently trying to champion in federal case 08-cv-01324, National Association of Home Builders vs. HUD.  This case could as easily be captioned Special $B$Interests to Eviscerate Consumer Rights vs. American Consumers.  FOIA request #2009-00355 returned 190 pages of responsive FTC records corroborating $B$DHI’s nationwide RICO and forcing consumers into using their affiliated lender contrary to existing RESPA laws.  7700 pages of administrative records submitted into evidence by HUD in federal case 08-cv-01324 will also in part prove DHI’s RICO in illegally forcing consumers into using their in house affiliated lender.  Over 500 pages of evidence proving $B$DHI RICO were sent by Express Mail under #EB527695415US, to the DOJ’s Dennis Barghaan who is lead attorney in 08-cv-01324.  Nearly 8400 pages of evidence in 08-cv-01324 already currently contradict Judge Edinfield’s ruling.

Special Magistrate Curtis Coltrane- South Carolina Court of Common Pleas, County of Beaufort, 06-CP-07-01658 and 02224.  In South Carolina’s hot real estate market of 2006, former Magistrate Coltrane censored Champoux’, Melendez’ and the Trotter’s Association inalienable 1^st Amendment speech, in favor of $B$DHI, when all they wanted to do was protect/inform the general public that $B$RICO operating DHI was grossly misrepresenting land sales and constructing homes with termite infested structural roof trusses.